Backstage & Influences

Poker superstar Phil Ivey has received approval that is preliminary A las vegas medical marijuana dispensary license in Nevada.
Phil Ivey isn’t smoking one thing, but his future clients may be: Ivey received one of 26 license that is preliminary for the medical marijuana dispensary from the vegas City Council early in the day this week, possibly making the poker superstar among the first operators within the city to offer pot to consumers.
There are still further actions necessary before Ivey gets final approval to open such a business, but his approval does suggest that the city found him qualified to go on in the licensing process.
This week to plead their cases for medical marijuana licenses about 50 potential operators went before the City Council. Those that got preliminary approval from the town will now have to be approved by the state health division.
The City Council will ultimately hold a final suitability conference for all approved by the state before awarding a restricted number of licenses that have been set aside for Las Vegas.
Meaning that Ivey still has a way that is long go before finding a final go-ahead to dispense medical marijuana in Sin City. But as he makes pot-sized bets at the poker table if he can make his way through the various licensing stages, Ivey might end up slinging weed just as prolifically.
Council Separate on Licensing Process
There’s been a great deal of controversy over the way Las Vegas has managed the pot licensing process, though who has more to do with procedural concerns than anything Ivey or some other licensee that is potential done.
Councilman Bob Coffin introduced a motion to delay the proceedings until after Nevada regulators weigh in regarding the suitability of each of the applicants week that is next. He worried that making public opinions on applicants before the state made its own suggestions could possibly lead to legal actions, and that waiting could allow the city to approach the issue with an ‘unbiased eye.’
But that motion ultimately failed, as a vote regarding the issue finished in a tie that is 3-3. Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian and councilman Ricki Barlow also voted to postpone the procedures, while Mayor Carolyn Goodman, spouse of infamous ex-mayor Oscar and mother of a applicatant by herself, abstained from the vote.
Among the many candidates that were approved were developer James Hammer, restaurant owner Michael Morton, and consultant that is political Thomas. Nuleaf, a Las Vegas-based company that is owned by a group that operates dispensaries in Ca, had been denied for a license.
‘I believe waiting might have made a difference,’ Nuleaf spokesman Bradley Mayer said. ‘We feel confident that their state will find we are a very qualified applicant.’
Ivey Headliner regarding the Year
This is just the most recent in a set of headlines made by Ivey that have nothing in connection with his prodigious skills at the poker table.
Possibly the biggest headlines were made in their various edge-sorting cases against Crockfords while the Borgata. Ivey currently lost the Crockfords instance in the UK’s tall Court of Justice, costing him over $12 million in winnings. a comparable instance against the Atlantic City casino is nevertheless pending, although in that case, it is the casino that is pursuing recourse to have its payouts returned. Ivey contends that the strategies he used in the games do not represent cheating, while the casinos, perhaps not surprisingly, disagree.
Final Saturday, Ivey also shut down the Ivey Poker internet site, ending operations just 18 months after the Facebook poker program launched. However, the poker legend said that the shut down ended up being just a transition for the product.
South Africa Online Gambling Ban Stirs Debate
South Africa is considering a ban on online gambling, along with stronger laws for land-based betting, such as electronic bingo terminals like these. (Image: OnlineCasinoArchives.co.za)
South Africa’s government is proposing a ban on a wide variety of gambling activities, including all forms of online gambling and other activities such as dog racing. That proposal is being discussed by the National Gambling Policy Council, which features members from both the national and provincial governments, as well as the Department of Trade and Industry.
In accordance with department officials, the government believes it gets the capability to enforce regulations on gambling, and that it’s unclear how jobs that are many created by the online gambling industry. It would also barely be a move that is unprecedented as many other jurisdictions around the globe have outlawed Internet gambling in the past.
Democratic Alliance Favors Regulation Over Ban
But while some government officials had been enthusiastic in regards to the possibility, the thought of a ban that is outright strongly denounced by the opposition Democratic Alliance.
‘That is just a very, really bad decision,’ said DA trade and industry spokesperson Geordin Hill-Lewis. ‘we fiercely disagree with that view. It really is completely shortsighted to say that it is better for Southern Africans not to ever be allowed to gamble online when there is patently significant need in the country to do that. It is for government to facilitate that within the way that is safest possible.’
In other words, the DA place is the fact that online gambling is better managed through legislation, instead than an outright ban. a full ban, Hill-Lewis said, would price far excessively in resources to enforce.
But Department of Trade and Industry Deputy Director-General Zodwa Ntuli said that the specific circumstances in South Africa meant that a ban will be good general public policy. She pointed away that the department’s proposal was made after recognizing that South Africa had a relatively high amount of problem gambling and debt contrasted with numerous countries.
Electronic Bingo Terminals Will Be Limited
In the event that department’s tips were to be law, it wouldn’t trigger a extensive ban of all gambling tasks in the country, but would rather restrict what will be allowed of the traditional forms https://slotsforfun-ca.com/quick-hits-slot-review/ of gaming being already present in South Africa. There would additionally be further controls put on electronic bingo terminals, which are presently allowed by provincial governments, even though there was no policy that is national the machines.
That conflict caused Trade and Industry Minister Rob Davies to issue a moratorium on any further licenses for the devices. The new tips would view a cap on the range machines allowed nationwide. It would additionally try to control the simplicity of access to these machines, with officials saying that gambling shouldn’t be allowed in shopping centers, for instance.
The new regulations would likewise incorporate a framework for allowing the federal government to raised oversee the horse rushing industry. While few details were available, it appeared that the absolute most significant changes there would come in the issuing of licenses, a process by which the government could affect change on the market.
Gambling regulation in South Africa is comparable to that associated with usa and Canada, at least with regards to the interplay between federal and governments that are local. While the federal government sets national policy, it is up to individual provinces to determine how each will issue licenses and gather revenues from gambling tasks.
Massachusetts Casino Repeal Vote Takes Place Tuesday
Despite long odds, anti-casino forces remain hoping for a success in Massachusetts. A ‘yes’ vote means ‘no gambling enterprises’. (Image: Repeal the Casino Deal)
A vote that will either lead to Massachusetts casino repeal or to the matter being put to bed for good is coming on Tuesday, though it would simply take a major upset for anti-casino advocates to get their way on Election Day. Those trying to defeat casinos are confusingly looking for voters to vote ‘Yes’ on Question 3, an idea that will put end to the 2012 legislation that is allowing the state to license video gaming houses over the state.
Based on the survey that is latest by the Western New England University Polling Institute, 59 % of likely voters into the state plan to vote ‘No’ on the ballot question, meaning ‘yes’ to legal casinos. Just 35 percent plan to vote ‘yes,’ in favor of the repeal. Those figures represent a gain that is major pro-casino forces, since a September poll showed just an 11 percent advantage for ‘no’ voters.
Of course, that’s assuming voters don’t get completely bewildered by the unintuitive ‘yes/no’ phrasing of the ballot effort itself.
Religious Voters Support Repeal
The numbers reveal that there is some success in efforts by religious leaders to get parishioners to oppose the casino law, with regular churchgoers being more inclined to vote ‘yes’ than their non-attending counterparts. But even Catholics who attend mass every week are opposed to repeal with a 17 per cent margin. In reality, Protestant voters who worship regularly make up about the actual only real demographic that favor repeal, doing so by a 55-45 margin.
Meanwhile, the advertising efforts by casinos and their allies appear to have been very effective. Support for the repeal in Western Massachusetts is reduced significantly compared to in prior polls, maybe due to advertising that touted some great benefits of the planned MGM casino in Springfield.
Battle Over Pros and Consequences
But while anti-casino advocates may be dealing with long odds on Tuesday, they’re nevertheless fighting in the final moments to get their message out. Groups like Repeal the Casino Deal believe that the casinos will offer you almost no benefit that is economic the individuals of Massachusetts, while increasing unlawful activity and gambling addiction.
‘ The cash isn’t arriving at the people of Massachusetts,’ said Al Cabot, an anti-casino advocate. ‘This is definitely money that’s going from one or two casinos in Connecticut to three casinos in Massachusetts.’
Unsurprisingly, those into the casino industry see things just a bit that is little. According to MGM Springfield President Mike Mathis, his business’s casino shall create 1000s of jobs and bring tens of millions of dollars in economic stimulus to town.
‘we have seen exactly what 25 years of no casino may do,’ Mathis said. ‘we want a chance.’
Mathis also disputes the concept that casinos would simply be taking money that is already spent in Massachusetts and shifting it to spending at his business’s resort.
‘A third of our customers are coming from Connecticut,’ Mathis said. ‘This concept that money is falling through the sky or we’re cannibalizing the market that is local just inaccurate.’
Gambling enterprises in Massachusetts: Pre-Election Status
So far, three licenses have been awarded to construct gambling venues in Massachusetts. Along with the MGM casino in Springfield, Wynn Resorts ended up being the champion of the more Boston license, beating out a competing plan by Mohegan Sun at Suffolk Downs in Revere. A license had been also granted to Penn National to create a slots parlor in Plainridge.
While casino opponents may short come up at the polls, just getting the question on the ballot was one thing of a victory. Although campaigners collected plenty of signatures to put the casino question to a referendum, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley originally rejected the question, forcing a showdown in their state’s Supreme Court over whether it would ultimately appear on this season’s ballot.
Next Post : AGA Wants AG Nominee Loretta Lynch Questioned on Illegal Gambling Stance
-
Document sans nom -
Search